Comparative characteristics of the properties of dental implants depending on the design, shape and surface in the experiment
Ескіз недоступний
Дата
2023
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Ausra, Kaunas, Lithuania
Анотація
The aim of the study. Compare the properties of different dental implants depending on the
design, shape and surface area in the experiment.
Materials and methods. Dental implants with similar sizes (5.5×10 mm) were selected:
Vitaplant VPKS, Mega Gen AnyRidge and Alpha Dent Superior Active. The calculation of the
total area of the implants was performed and the implants were immersed in a ferromagnetic
substance.
Results and discussion. The small number of turns and their small length of the Vitaplant
implant cannot create a large surface area (this size of the implant has an area of 174.7 mm2
).
On the thin, slightly conical body of the MegaGen implant (North Korea), the developer
placed 10 turns of thread with wide blades. Due to the data design features, this implant has
the largest surface area (276.5 mm2
), which is an advantage in implant integration.
The same number of turns (10) and a very similar frequency bring Alpha Dent implants
(Germany) closer to the implant described above, but the design implements an innovative
anti-rotation system. This implant size has a total surface area of 210.5 mm2
.
Conclusions. The implant Vitaplant VPKS is inferior in effi ciency of the geometry of the
implant Mega Gen AnyRidge by 24%, and the implant Alpha Dent Superior Active in turn
ahead of the effi ciency of the representative of the Korean company by 8.9%. The shape of the
geometry of the implant affects the effectiveness of counteracting the masticatory load more
than its surface area.
Опис
Ключові слова
shape of dental implant, efficiency of the geometry
Бібліографічний опис
Comparative characteristics of the properties of dental implants depending on the design, shape and surface in the experiment / D. Kaplun, D. Avetikov, K. Lokes, O. Ivanytska // Stomatologija. Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal. – 2023. – Vol. 25, № 1. – P. 21–25.