Vodoriz, Y. Y.Tkachenko, I. M.Nazarenko, Z. Y.Pisarenko, O. A.Gurzhiy, O. V.Водоріз, Ярослав ЮрійовичТкаченко, Ірина МихайлівнаНазаренко, Зоряна ЮріївнаПисаренко, Олег АнатолійовичГуржій, Олена Вікторівна2022-11-252022-11-252022-09The prevalence of rubber dam among dentists in different countries / Y. Y. Vodoriz, I. M. Tkachenko, Z. Y. Nazarenko [et al.] // Wiadomosci Lekarskie. – 2022. – T. 75, nr. 9, cz. 2. – P. 2252–2255.0043-51472719-342Xhttps://repository.pdmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/19487The aim: To assess the actual prevalence of rubber dam usage among general dentists. Materials and methods: Surveyed participants were offered a questionnaire containing 14 questions about gender, country of origin, clinical experience, time and place of acquisition of skills of rubber dam, as well as the frequency of its usage. Results: 30.69% of dentists always use rubber dams for direct restorations; 74.26% always use rubber dams during root canals treatment; 36.3% always use rubber dam for bonding indirect restorations. Conclusions: The prevalence of rubber usage among general dentists shows positive growth dynamics, but the frequency is still considered insufficient.enrubber damsdental general practiceendodonticsschool dentistrydental researchThe prevalence of rubber dam among dentists in different countriesArticle10.36740/WLek202209213