Наукові праці. Кафедра анатомії з клінічною анатомією та оперативною хірургією
Постійне посилання зібрання
Переглянути
Перегляд Наукові праці. Кафедра анатомії з клінічною анатомією та оперативною хірургією за Автор "Bieliaieva, O. M."
Зараз показуємо 1 - 4 з 4
Результатів на сторінці
Налаштування сортування
Документ «Miller's pyramid», the «onion model», the «portfolio method», the «assessment orbits»: how to evaluate the professionality of a doctor?(Полтавський державний медичний університет, 2024) Bieliaieva, O. M.; Bilash, S. M.; Skrypnykov, P. M.; Lysanets, Yu. V.; Skrypnikova, T. P.; Khmil, T. A.; Taran, Z. M.; Бєляєва, Олена Миколаївна; Білаш, Сергій Михайлович; Скрипников, Петро Миколайович; Лисанець, Юлія Валеріївна; Скрипнікова, Таїса Петрівна; Хміль, Тетяна Андріївна; Таран, Зінаїда МихайлівнаThe article focuses on the issue of assessing a doctor's professionalism, exploring various methodologies proposed by experts in medical pedagogy. Concepts such as "Miller's pyramid," the "onion model," and the "portfolio method", «assessment orbits» are thoroughly examined. Particularly highlighted is the adaptation of "Miller's pyramid" in response to the evolving focus of medical education towards fostering professionalism and shaping professional identity. The article scrutinizes perspectives advocating for the incorporation of a fifth tier into the traditional four-tier structure of "Miller's pyramid," emphasizing the attitudes, values, and behaviors indicative of a doctor's emerging professional ethos. Additionally, a succinct overview of the "onion model" is provided. The portfolio method is emphasized for its role in organizing, shaping, and facilitating continuous assessment of the educational accomplishments of medical students. The «assessment orbits» are characterized. Стаття присвячена питанню оцінювання професійності лікаря. Розглянуто різні концепції, які пропонуються фахівцями в галузі медичної педагогіки для розв’язання цього завдання ‒ «піраміду Міллера», «модель цибулини», «метод портфоліо», «орбіти оцінювання». Значну увагу приділено модифікації «піраміди Міллера», що зумовлено зміщенням у медичній освіті акцентів на розвиток професійності і формування професійної ідентичності. Проаналізовано погляди вчених, які вважають, що додавання до класичної чотиристратумної структури «піраміди Міллера» п’ятого стратуму послідовно демонструє ставлення, цінності та поведінку, які очкують від того, хто почав думати, діяти і відчувати себе лікарем. Коротко розглянуто «модель цибулини». Приділено увагу методу портфоліо як процесу організації, форми та технології роботи, що уможливлює безперервне оцінювання досягнення суб’єктів медичної освіти. Схарактеризовано «орбіти оцінювання».Документ Monitoring of the higher education quality as an objective necessity of the educational system innovative development(Global Science Center LP (Прага), 2016) Zhdan, V.; Bobyriov, V. M.; Bilash, S.; Bieliaieva, O. M.; Ждан, Вячеслав Миколайович; Бобирьов, Віктор Миколайович; Білаш, Сергій Михайлович; Бєляєва, Олена МиколаївнаThe theoretical framework for monitoring of the higher education quality was reviewed in the article. The types, principles, tasks and functions of monitoring were systematized, also the evaluation and diagnostic criteria for the assessment of quality in higher educational establishments were specified. The authors determine the main approaches of improving the higher education quality in increasing the level of applicants training, conducting career guidance to future specialists in a certain branch, increasing the motivation of all educational process participants, improving the high school logistical support, further informatization of the educational process, its availability, transparency and openness of its results, development of scientific and pedagogical stuff competence.Документ The biographical method as a means of forming the professional personality and professional identity of the future doctor (as exemplified by the integration of the study of human anatomy and the disciplines of the foreign language training cycle)(Полтавський державний медичний університет, 2023) Bieliaieva, O. M.; Bilash, S. M.; Pronina, O. M.; Lysanets, Yu. V.; Bilash, V. P.; Havrylieva, K. H.; Taran, Z. M.; Бєляєва, Олена Миколаївна; Білаш, Сергій Михайлович; Проніна, Олена Миколаївна; Лисанець, Юлія Валеріївна; Білаш, Валентина Павлівна; Гаврильєва, Ксеня Григорівна; Таран, Зінаїда МихайлівнаBiographies of outstanding personalities serve as both a means and a source of historical knowledge, which acquires special importance in the process of training future doctors, because medicine maintains an inseparable connection between the past and the present, and any scientific discoveries accumulate or nullify the achievements of predecessors. On the one hand, biographical method is aimed at realizing the role of the individual in history, and on the other – at understanding the influence of history, in fact, society, at a specific stage of its existence, social contexts, ethical rules and norms, society on the formation of an individual and his life path, choosing a life position, ideals and values, dialogue between an outstanding personality and contemporaries. Reconstructing the curriculum vitae, the biographical method enables the reproduction of the socio-political and socio-cultural contexts in which scientific discoveries, cultural and other achievements arose and spread, serving as one of means of forming the professional personality and professional identity of the future doctor, in particular, in the process of studying anatomy and disciplines of the foreign language training cycle.Документ The debate surrounding academic ratings: a critical analysis(Полтавський державний медичний університет, 2023) Bieliaieva, O. M.; Lysanets, Yu. V.; Bilash, S. M.; Skrypnikova, T. P.; Khmil, T. A.; Solohor, I. M.; Havrylieva, K. H.; Бєляєва, Олена Миколаївна; Лисанець, Юлія Валеріївна; Білаш, Сергій Михайлович; Скрипнікова, Таїса Петрівна; Хміль, Тетяна Андріївна; Сологор, Ірина Миколаївна; Гаврильєва, Ксеня ГригорівнаThe article is devoted to the phenomenon of academic ratings, which have now become one of the influential levers for determining the competitiveness of higher education institutions at the international, national, and regional levels, as well as a natural result of its mass and commercialized nature. The authors observe that during the entire period of existence of academic ratings, there has been an ardent discussion about their usefulness, objectivity, quality and validity. The paper discusses the arguments of the opponents of academic ratings, which emphasize that they are often biased or based on methodologies that are not transparent (weight of compared indicators, calculation algorithms, methodological validity in data collection, etc.). The authors argue that despite the constant and painstaking work of the compilers to make the ratings as transparent as possible, for now, they often do not meet the expectations of university management and the academic community, and also provide little useful information necessary for real and potential stakeholders. The analysis of the literature on the researched issue proved that this especially applies to representatives of European universities. Opponents of the ratings explain this status quo by the fundamental difference, on the one hand, between the British and American educational systems, and on the other, between the national educational systems of Europe. Attention is focused on the fact that the orientation of the ratings mainly on the bibliometric analysis of scientific publications of academic staff is, for example, disadvantageous for French universities, since a feature of the French higher education system (in contrast to the British or American) is that scientific activity is mainly concentrated in research centers, whereas educational activities – in universities. It is noted that the analysis of quality indicators of various areas of activity of a higher education institution and the educational system of the country as a whole makes it possible to obtain unbiased information about competitiveness in the field under study. In connection with this, the “struggle for one’s place in the sun” should be perceived as a reality that determines both the current state and the prospects for the further development of higher education. The authors conclude that the ratings, despite the controversy, have become an integral part of the global educational and information space, serving as one of the tools for measuring institutional capacity, finding new approaches to the effective use of the potential of universities, adjusting the development strategy and stimulating positive changes in the educational environment.